Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
Political Science
University of Pennsylvania
2017
Robinson Woodward-Burns researches American constitutional thought and development, focusing on civil and voting rights, federalism, and slavery and abolitionism. He holds a Ph.D. and M.A. from the University of Pennsylvania, an M.A. from the University of Maryland, and a B.A. from the College of William and Mary.
His first book, Hidden Laws: How State Constitutions Stabilize American Politics, was published in 2021 by Yale University Press. Using datasets and historical case studies, the book argues that high barriers to national constitutional change have encouraged reformers to instead seek state constitutional revision, addressing national controversies over economic and labor regulations and voting, civil, and gender rights. He is writing a second book on state constitutionalism and voting rights. He recently held a Kluge Fellowship at the Library of Congress. His research has also been published in The Journal of Politics, Polity, Perspectives on Politics, Studies in American Political Development, The Maryland Law Review, The Nebraska Law Review, and The Atlantic, and The Washington Post. You can find more information on his website and Twitter profiles.
Political Science
University of Pennsylvania
2017
Political Science
University of Pennsylvania
2014
Government and Politics
University of Maryland
2012
College of William and Mary
2010
Read: The Hilltop | Nine Months In: Project 2025’S Accelerated Implementation
Read: Maryland Matters | Pardoned Maryland Jan. 6 participants find support after convictions
Read: NBC4 | Trayon White channels Marion Barry as he fights corruption charges, expulsion from DC Council
Hidden Laws: How State Constitutions Stabilize American Politics
State constitution reform guides and stabilizes American constitutional and political development. Using data sets and historical case studies, Robinson Woodward‑Burns shows how the federal government has repeatedly deferred to state constitutional reform to manage or address difficult national constitutional controversies, including conflicts over the regulation of slavery, banking and taxation, women’s suffrage, labor and welfare rights, voting and civil rights, and gender discrimination.
The Lost Clause: Reinterpreting the Declaration’s Silence on the Atlantic Slave Trade
Jefferson’s first draft of the Declaration of Independence condemned King George III for maintaining the international slave trade. The clause denounced the “execrable trade” for violating enslaved people’s “rights of life & liberty,” thus alienating slave-trading congressional delegates, who forced Jefferson to cut the clause. Generations of scholars have mourned this deletion. This essay offers an alternate reading of the clause
Judicial Power and the Shifting Purpose of Article V
Through a mixed-methods approach, we first document the shifting purpose of Article V at an aggregate level by coding all 11,969 proposed constitutional amendments throughout American history. We then substantiate the shifting purpose of Article V through a series of in-depth case studies focused on polygamy, women's suffrage, Equal Rights Amendments, and Federal Marriage Amendments. Taken together, this evidence helps us understand Article V as a repurposed institution and suggests that textually static constitutional provisions nonetheless may be open to reinvention at the behavioral level in subtle but important ways.
Rethinking Self-Reliance: Emerson on Mobbing, War, and Abolition
A famous proponent of solitude and self-reliance, Ralph Waldo Emerson rejected the conformity of Jacksonian mobs and mass parties for solitary nature walks, and so has long been read as an antipolitical figure. Recent scholars have reinterpreted Emersonian self-reliance to include extralegal boycotts of slave-made goods and resistance to the Fugitive Slave Act. This essay takes these accounts a step further, arguing that Emerson saw that some forms of extralegal cooperative action were compatible with self-reliance.
The Person Who Changes the Constitution
One civil servant will determine whether the ERA gets added to America’s founding document—the question is which authority he’ll turn to for guidance.